Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
117
 questions about 
Children
170
 questions about 
Freedom
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Punishment
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Perception
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
89
 questions about 
Law
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
51
 questions about 
War
36
 questions about 
Literature
67
 questions about 
Feminism
287
 questions about 
Language
218
 questions about 
Education
4
 questions about 
Economics
124
 questions about 
Profession
154
 questions about 
Sex
81
 questions about 
Identity
75
 questions about 
Beauty
105
 questions about 
Art
68
 questions about 
Happiness
24
 questions about 
Suicide
32
 questions about 
Sport
244
 questions about 
Justice
88
 questions about 
Physics
34
 questions about 
Music
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Culture
77
 questions about 
Emotion
284
 questions about 
Mind
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Abortion
27
 questions about 
Gender
43
 questions about 
Color
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
374
 questions about 
Logic
151
 questions about 
Existence
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Biology
221
 questions about 
Value
54
 questions about 
Medicine
69
 questions about 
Business
392
 questions about 
Religion

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.