Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
43
 questions about 
Color
170
 questions about 
Freedom
24
 questions about 
Suicide
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Beauty
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Biology
34
 questions about 
Music
4
 questions about 
Economics
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Animals
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
32
 questions about 
Sport
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Action
70
 questions about 
Truth
208
 questions about 
Science
284
 questions about 
Mind
287
 questions about 
Language
80
 questions about 
Death
23
 questions about 
History
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
134
 questions about 
Love
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
39
 questions about 
Race
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Perception
154
 questions about 
Sex
124
 questions about 
Profession
54
 questions about 
Medicine
69
 questions about 
Business
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Culture
218
 questions about 
Education
96
 questions about 
Time

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.