Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
39
 questions about 
Race
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
154
 questions about 
Sex
75
 questions about 
Beauty
4
 questions about 
Economics
124
 questions about 
Profession
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Animals
221
 questions about 
Value
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Action
31
 questions about 
Space
77
 questions about 
Emotion
51
 questions about 
War
105
 questions about 
Art
89
 questions about 
Law
24
 questions about 
Suicide
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Perception
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
32
 questions about 
Sport
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Abortion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
392
 questions about 
Religion
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Biology
170
 questions about 
Freedom
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
96
 questions about 
Time
23
 questions about 
History
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
244
 questions about 
Justice
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
34
 questions about 
Music
374
 questions about 
Logic
134
 questions about 
Love
68
 questions about 
Happiness
287
 questions about 
Language
218
 questions about 
Education

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.