Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Punishment
117
 questions about 
Children
23
 questions about 
History
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
69
 questions about 
Business
287
 questions about 
Language
81
 questions about 
Identity
151
 questions about 
Existence
77
 questions about 
Emotion
80
 questions about 
Death
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
105
 questions about 
Art
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
154
 questions about 
Sex
221
 questions about 
Value
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Biology
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Culture
96
 questions about 
Time
170
 questions about 
Freedom
54
 questions about 
Medicine
36
 questions about 
Literature
68
 questions about 
Happiness
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Animals
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
58
 questions about 
Abortion
27
 questions about 
Gender
88
 questions about 
Physics
34
 questions about 
Music
208
 questions about 
Science
43
 questions about 
Color

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.