Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Culture
51
 questions about 
War
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
23
 questions about 
History
374
 questions about 
Logic
39
 questions about 
Race
77
 questions about 
Emotion
32
 questions about 
Sport
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Animals
170
 questions about 
Freedom
69
 questions about 
Business
81
 questions about 
Identity
284
 questions about 
Mind
70
 questions about 
Truth
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
27
 questions about 
Gender
89
 questions about 
Law
68
 questions about 
Happiness
80
 questions about 
Death
124
 questions about 
Profession
31
 questions about 
Space
287
 questions about 
Language
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
4
 questions about 
Economics
88
 questions about 
Physics
244
 questions about 
Justice
221
 questions about 
Value
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Punishment
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Perception
34
 questions about 
Music
154
 questions about 
Sex
54
 questions about 
Medicine
208
 questions about 
Science
392
 questions about 
Religion
96
 questions about 
Time
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Beauty
117
 questions about 
Children

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.