Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
154
 questions about 
Sex
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Biology
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Animals
88
 questions about 
Physics
124
 questions about 
Profession
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
77
 questions about 
Emotion
117
 questions about 
Children
218
 questions about 
Education
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Punishment
221
 questions about 
Value
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Culture
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Action
51
 questions about 
War
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
284
 questions about 
Mind
36
 questions about 
Literature
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race
70
 questions about 
Truth
96
 questions about 
Time
27
 questions about 
Gender
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice
69
 questions about 
Business
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.