Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

221
 questions about 
Value
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Punishment
58
 questions about 
Abortion
34
 questions about 
Music
39
 questions about 
Race
4
 questions about 
Economics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
284
 questions about 
Mind
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Culture
54
 questions about 
Medicine
287
 questions about 
Language
43
 questions about 
Color
69
 questions about 
Business
68
 questions about 
Happiness
27
 questions about 
Gender
80
 questions about 
Death
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Animals
170
 questions about 
Freedom
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
81
 questions about 
Identity
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
36
 questions about 
Literature
70
 questions about 
Truth
218
 questions about 
Education
88
 questions about 
Physics
244
 questions about 
Justice
23
 questions about 
History
67
 questions about 
Feminism
24
 questions about 
Suicide
31
 questions about 
Space
2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
134
 questions about 
Love
77
 questions about 
Emotion
124
 questions about 
Profession
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
89
 questions about 
Law
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.