Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Culture
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Abortion
69
 questions about 
Business
117
 questions about 
Children
68
 questions about 
Happiness
24
 questions about 
Suicide
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
151
 questions about 
Existence
124
 questions about 
Profession
154
 questions about 
Sex
23
 questions about 
History
32
 questions about 
Sport
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Beauty
34
 questions about 
Music
105
 questions about 
Art
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
374
 questions about 
Logic
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Biology
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Punishment
54
 questions about 
Medicine
51
 questions about 
War
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
218
 questions about 
Education
4
 questions about 
Economics
287
 questions about 
Language
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
27
 questions about 
Gender
81
 questions about 
Identity
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Animals
208
 questions about 
Science
36
 questions about 
Literature
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.