Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
68
 questions about 
Happiness
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Abortion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
88
 questions about 
Physics
284
 questions about 
Mind
134
 questions about 
Love
31
 questions about 
Space
70
 questions about 
Truth
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
170
 questions about 
Freedom
208
 questions about 
Science
27
 questions about 
Gender
392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
80
 questions about 
Death
124
 questions about 
Profession
105
 questions about 
Art
32
 questions about 
Sport
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
54
 questions about 
Medicine
39
 questions about 
Race
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
89
 questions about 
Law
154
 questions about 
Sex
34
 questions about 
Music
77
 questions about 
Emotion
23
 questions about 
History
43
 questions about 
Color
244
 questions about 
Justice
81
 questions about 
Identity
51
 questions about 
War
151
 questions about 
Existence
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Beauty
110
 questions about 
Biology
69
 questions about 
Business
221
 questions about 
Value

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.