Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Action
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
218
 questions about 
Education
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
36
 questions about 
Literature
374
 questions about 
Logic
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Punishment
80
 questions about 
Death
34
 questions about 
Music
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence
24
 questions about 
Suicide
105
 questions about 
Art
77
 questions about 
Emotion
208
 questions about 
Science
124
 questions about 
Profession
70
 questions about 
Truth
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
96
 questions about 
Time
89
 questions about 
Law
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Culture
81
 questions about 
Identity
31
 questions about 
Space
134
 questions about 
Love
117
 questions about 
Children
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
27
 questions about 
Gender
67
 questions about 
Feminism
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Abortion
154
 questions about 
Sex
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness
221
 questions about 
Value
287
 questions about 
Language
43
 questions about 
Color

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.