Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

151
 questions about 
Existence
117
 questions about 
Children
70
 questions about 
Truth
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
58
 questions about 
Abortion
39
 questions about 
Race
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Animals
134
 questions about 
Love
4
 questions about 
Economics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
32
 questions about 
Sport
284
 questions about 
Mind
244
 questions about 
Justice
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Punishment
221
 questions about 
Value
81
 questions about 
Identity
218
 questions about 
Education
27
 questions about 
Gender
69
 questions about 
Business
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
154
 questions about 
Sex
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
31
 questions about 
Space
124
 questions about 
Profession
105
 questions about 
Art
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Beauty
75
 questions about 
Perception
43
 questions about 
Color
374
 questions about 
Logic
51
 questions about 
War
89
 questions about 
Law
2
 questions about 
Culture
96
 questions about 
Time
170
 questions about 
Freedom
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
287
 questions about 
Language
23
 questions about 
History
208
 questions about 
Science

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.