Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
124
 questions about 
Profession
23
 questions about 
History
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
88
 questions about 
Physics
221
 questions about 
Value
392
 questions about 
Religion
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Biology
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
81
 questions about 
Identity
36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
154
 questions about 
Sex
77
 questions about 
Emotion
244
 questions about 
Justice
208
 questions about 
Science
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Animals
80
 questions about 
Death
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
39
 questions about 
Race
34
 questions about 
Music
27
 questions about 
Gender
89
 questions about 
Law
96
 questions about 
Time
287
 questions about 
Language
31
 questions about 
Space
68
 questions about 
Happiness
374
 questions about 
Logic
70
 questions about 
Truth
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Perception
24
 questions about 
Suicide
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.