Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
70
 questions about 
Truth
244
 questions about 
Justice
43
 questions about 
Color
27
 questions about 
Gender
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Culture
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Perception
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
88
 questions about 
Physics
392
 questions about 
Religion
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Action
23
 questions about 
History
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
68
 questions about 
Happiness
154
 questions about 
Sex
39
 questions about 
Race
67
 questions about 
Feminism
105
 questions about 
Art
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
96
 questions about 
Time
69
 questions about 
Business
31
 questions about 
Space
4
 questions about 
Economics
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
287
 questions about 
Language
282
 questions about 
Knowledge

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.