Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

170
 questions about 
Freedom
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Abortion
27
 questions about 
Gender
284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Animals
117
 questions about 
Children
134
 questions about 
Love
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
34
 questions about 
Music
392
 questions about 
Religion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
80
 questions about 
Death
58
 questions about 
Punishment
124
 questions about 
Profession
96
 questions about 
Time
4
 questions about 
Economics
208
 questions about 
Science
32
 questions about 
Sport
23
 questions about 
History
77
 questions about 
Emotion
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Action
69
 questions about 
Business
68
 questions about 
Happiness
221
 questions about 
Value
31
 questions about 
Space
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
81
 questions about 
Identity
244
 questions about 
Justice
67
 questions about 
Feminism
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Culture
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Perception
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Beauty
36
 questions about 
Literature
218
 questions about 
Education
70
 questions about 
Truth
374
 questions about 
Logic
51
 questions about 
War

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.