Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
36
 questions about 
Literature
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Perception
284
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Animals
124
 questions about 
Profession
208
 questions about 
Science
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Culture
2
 questions about 
Action
244
 questions about 
Justice
117
 questions about 
Children
134
 questions about 
Love
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
154
 questions about 
Sex
75
 questions about 
Beauty
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Abortion
89
 questions about 
Law
151
 questions about 
Existence
70
 questions about 
Truth
392
 questions about 
Religion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Punishment
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
96
 questions about 
Time
374
 questions about 
Logic
27
 questions about 
Gender
23
 questions about 
History
105
 questions about 
Art
68
 questions about 
Happiness
51
 questions about 
War
77
 questions about 
Emotion
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
31
 questions about 
Space
67
 questions about 
Feminism
221
 questions about 
Value
39
 questions about 
Race

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.