Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

67
 questions about 
Feminism
221
 questions about 
Value
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Beauty
117
 questions about 
Children
218
 questions about 
Education
80
 questions about 
Death
27
 questions about 
Gender
34
 questions about 
Music
39
 questions about 
Race
134
 questions about 
Love
23
 questions about 
History
51
 questions about 
War
81
 questions about 
Identity
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Perception
70
 questions about 
Truth
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
89
 questions about 
Law
24
 questions about 
Suicide
284
 questions about 
Mind
287
 questions about 
Language
31
 questions about 
Space
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Animals
77
 questions about 
Emotion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
392
 questions about 
Religion
244
 questions about 
Justice
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
374
 questions about 
Logic
43
 questions about 
Color
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Biology
69
 questions about 
Business
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
96
 questions about 
Time
58
 questions about 
Abortion
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.