Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

51
 questions about 
War
374
 questions about 
Logic
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Action
89
 questions about 
Law
105
 questions about 
Art
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Punishment
124
 questions about 
Profession
284
 questions about 
Mind
77
 questions about 
Emotion
31
 questions about 
Space
4
 questions about 
Economics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
170
 questions about 
Freedom
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
81
 questions about 
Identity
75
 questions about 
Beauty
96
 questions about 
Time
208
 questions about 
Science
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
151
 questions about 
Existence
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Abortion
27
 questions about 
Gender
34
 questions about 
Music
221
 questions about 
Value
54
 questions about 
Medicine
392
 questions about 
Religion
70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
80
 questions about 
Death
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Biology
88
 questions about 
Physics
117
 questions about 
Children
244
 questions about 
Justice
67
 questions about 
Feminism
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Culture
24
 questions about 
Suicide
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
287
 questions about 
Language
69
 questions about 
Business
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Perception

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.