Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

69
 questions about 
Business
154
 questions about 
Sex
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Culture
221
 questions about 
Value
27
 questions about 
Gender
39
 questions about 
Race
218
 questions about 
Education
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
75
 questions about 
Perception
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
208
 questions about 
Science
88
 questions about 
Physics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
117
 questions about 
Children
124
 questions about 
Profession
32
 questions about 
Sport
105
 questions about 
Art
96
 questions about 
Time
70
 questions about 
Truth
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
67
 questions about 
Feminism
23
 questions about 
History
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Abortion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Punishment
51
 questions about 
War
81
 questions about 
Identity
75
 questions about 
Beauty
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
392
 questions about 
Religion
284
 questions about 
Mind
54
 questions about 
Medicine
24
 questions about 
Suicide

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.