Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

69
 questions about 
Business
374
 questions about 
Logic
96
 questions about 
Time
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
117
 questions about 
Children
31
 questions about 
Space
218
 questions about 
Education
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Culture
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
54
 questions about 
Medicine
51
 questions about 
War
39
 questions about 
Race
284
 questions about 
Mind
124
 questions about 
Profession
392
 questions about 
Religion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
43
 questions about 
Color
89
 questions about 
Law
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
81
 questions about 
Identity
68
 questions about 
Happiness
67
 questions about 
Feminism
88
 questions about 
Physics
208
 questions about 
Science
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Action
58
 questions about 
Punishment
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
70
 questions about 
Truth
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature
221
 questions about 
Value
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Beauty
170
 questions about 
Freedom
151
 questions about 
Existence
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Animals
23
 questions about 
History

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.