Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
67
 questions about 
Feminism
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Action
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Animals
117
 questions about 
Children
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
68
 questions about 
Happiness
36
 questions about 
Literature
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Culture
34
 questions about 
Music
39
 questions about 
Race
170
 questions about 
Freedom
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Perception
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
96
 questions about 
Time
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
77
 questions about 
Emotion
105
 questions about 
Art
392
 questions about 
Religion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide
27
 questions about 
Gender
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
218
 questions about 
Education
69
 questions about 
Business
287
 questions about 
Language
43
 questions about 
Color
124
 questions about 
Profession
54
 questions about 
Medicine
31
 questions about 
Space
208
 questions about 
Science
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.