Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

1280
 questions about 
Ethics
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
244
 questions about 
Justice
27
 questions about 
Gender
51
 questions about 
War
89
 questions about 
Law
117
 questions about 
Children
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
96
 questions about 
Time
43
 questions about 
Color
32
 questions about 
Sport
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
124
 questions about 
Profession
58
 questions about 
Abortion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
54
 questions about 
Medicine
287
 questions about 
Language
81
 questions about 
Identity
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
36
 questions about 
Literature
69
 questions about 
Business
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
67
 questions about 
Feminism
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Perception
70
 questions about 
Truth
392
 questions about 
Religion
23
 questions about 
History
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
151
 questions about 
Existence
170
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
88
 questions about 
Physics
80
 questions about 
Death
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Culture
34
 questions about 
Music

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.