Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Perception
4
 questions about 
Economics
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Culture
392
 questions about 
Religion
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
151
 questions about 
Existence
218
 questions about 
Education
27
 questions about 
Gender
51
 questions about 
War
89
 questions about 
Law
67
 questions about 
Feminism
54
 questions about 
Medicine
96
 questions about 
Time
244
 questions about 
Justice
70
 questions about 
Truth
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Animals
34
 questions about 
Music
284
 questions about 
Mind
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
110
 questions about 
Biology
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
77
 questions about 
Emotion
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
81
 questions about 
Identity
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
24
 questions about 
Suicide
287
 questions about 
Language
117
 questions about 
Children
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Punishment
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
39
 questions about 
Race
68
 questions about 
Happiness
31
 questions about 
Space
1280
 questions about 
Ethics

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.