Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

96
 questions about 
Time
218
 questions about 
Education
27
 questions about 
Gender
70
 questions about 
Truth
36
 questions about 
Literature
88
 questions about 
Physics
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
31
 questions about 
Space
68
 questions about 
Happiness
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Beauty
54
 questions about 
Medicine
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Perception
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
170
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Action
58
 questions about 
Punishment
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
392
 questions about 
Religion
221
 questions about 
Value
244
 questions about 
Justice
110
 questions about 
Animals
69
 questions about 
Business
80
 questions about 
Death
67
 questions about 
Feminism
134
 questions about 
Love
81
 questions about 
Identity
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
34
 questions about 
Music
284
 questions about 
Mind
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
117
 questions about 
Children
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
24
 questions about 
Suicide

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.