Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

221
 questions about 
Value
88
 questions about 
Physics
208
 questions about 
Science
27
 questions about 
Gender
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
31
 questions about 
Space
105
 questions about 
Art
89
 questions about 
Law
32
 questions about 
Sport
170
 questions about 
Freedom
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Beauty
43
 questions about 
Color
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
2
 questions about 
Action
70
 questions about 
Truth
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Animals
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Punishment
68
 questions about 
Happiness
284
 questions about 
Mind
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
36
 questions about 
Literature
374
 questions about 
Logic
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Perception
244
 questions about 
Justice
67
 questions about 
Feminism
24
 questions about 
Suicide
287
 questions about 
Language
69
 questions about 
Business
151
 questions about 
Existence
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Culture
117
 questions about 
Children
392
 questions about 
Religion

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.