Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
23
 questions about 
History
39
 questions about 
Race
88
 questions about 
Physics
34
 questions about 
Music
284
 questions about 
Mind
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Punishment
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Perception
43
 questions about 
Color
67
 questions about 
Feminism
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Abortion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
244
 questions about 
Justice
69
 questions about 
Business
27
 questions about 
Gender
4
 questions about 
Economics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
151
 questions about 
Existence
124
 questions about 
Profession
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
221
 questions about 
Value
70
 questions about 
Truth
374
 questions about 
Logic
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Beauty
80
 questions about 
Death
36
 questions about 
Literature
32
 questions about 
Sport
105
 questions about 
Art
170
 questions about 
Freedom
287
 questions about 
Language
117
 questions about 
Children
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Culture
77
 questions about 
Emotion
31
 questions about 
Space
154
 questions about 
Sex
392
 questions about 
Religion
51
 questions about 
War
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.